For families

Access without silent data collection.

Private use is the default. Extra support for your child is a separate choice. Helping improve the model is another. No choice is ever made for you.

Read data governance ↗See the student experience →

04 / Family trust

You should not need a law degree to know what happens to your child’s question.

Three purposes. Three different permissions.

Access is not consent to collect.

School use and disability access do not create a blanket exception for children’s data. Sign First collects less, separates purposes, and keeps contribution optional—there is no loophole to find.

Confirmed question → selected AI

Use the access layer without building a learner profile.

What stays protected

Camera frames stay in the live recognition step

Unchecked guesses never reach the tutor

No long-term learner profile is built

What may move

Signer-confirmed intent

Class context, if chosen for this request

Service health signals with no content

What this choice never authorizes

Keeping video or audio

Silent personalization

Use for training

Current evidence boundaryThese controls are shown with test identities and records. Real child approval, school use, legal review, and learning outcomes are still open gates.

Three abstract interface forms changing in scale and detail — **Presentation can adapt without collecting an exact birth date.**Designed capability—not a validated child outcome.

Private by default

A question does not become training data.

The product does not keep video or audio. Asking a question does not train the model. Nothing turns on by itself.

Separate choices

Support and contribution are not one checkbox.

Private use, personal support, and model contribution are three separate permissions. In the research build, no real child can be enrolled at all.

Honest readiness

Technical controls are not student validation.

Today these controls are tested with made-up learner profiles. Real use still needs approval from schools, families, students, lawyers, and Deaf-led reviewers.

From private session to chosen support

Useful support without invisible enrollment.

A family can choose bounded personalization without turning access into contribution, and can revoke that purpose without losing the right to use the product.

Learner today

The signer reviews and owns every meaning the system proposes.

Support next

Support can deepen with the learner without shrinking their authority.

Natural access

The interface recedes; the right to reject or repair never does.

Continue exploring

Inspect the evidence behind each promise.

Evidence→Safety→FAQ→