Working research, shown honestly. See what is verified and what is not →Working research · inspect evidence →
Sign First

Contact

Start with the question you need to answer.

Sign First is currently a controlled research and stakeholder-demonstration platform. Conversations should begin with the audience, academic risk, and evidence required—not a generic deployment promise.

12 / A useful conversation

Schools, families, researchers, and technical partners need different evidence and different next steps.

Prepare the conversation

Send a bounded stakeholder brief.

This path records adult stakeholder contact information in the ASD-owned Sign First project. Do not include a student name, record, diagnosis, or signed-language sample.

Read the current privacy boundary →

Camera frame opening into a protected product pathway
Begin with the real input, audience, and decision boundary.Entry concept; no recognition-accuracy implication.
01

Deaf community

This work needs Deaf review before it needs customers.

Sign First is built by a hearing team. Deaf, DeafBlind, and hard-of-hearing professionals — educators, researchers, and the Deaf-led teams already building AI for Deaf students — hold the judgment this work is gated on. If that is you, we are asking for your review, your criticism, or your leadership.

02

Schools

Define the educational decision and governance boundary.

Identify the age range, academic context, current access path, institutional controls, and evidence that would be required before any pilot discussion.

03

Researchers

Define the claim and independent evaluation set.

Recognition, selective intervention, answer assurance, usability, and learning outcomes are different claims and should not share weak proxy evidence.

04

Technology providers

Define the adapter and the output contract.

A candidate integration needs programmatic access, permitted use, privacy controls, provenance, output semantics, and an independently testable failure surface.

From interest to an answerable question

The next conversation begins with a claim—not a pitch.

The audience, academic decision, data boundary, integration contract, and required evidence determine whether a next step is useful.
01

What exists

A working, certified control path anyone can inspect today.
02

What unlocks

Bounded personalization and quieter assurance, as evidence and permission arrive.
03

Where this goes

Direct signed access to approved AI, with authority always recoverable.

Continue exploring

Prepare with the relevant product evidence.

Educators→Integrations→Evidence→